DTr

say want make angular directive generates links resources this: <a href="http://link/to/resource/1234">link/to/resource/1234</a> from object looks like: resource = { id: 1234, otherproperty: 'foo' } how can w/ directive? ie, i'd not have repeat part goes '/link/to/resource/{{id}}' . can't seem work right. 1 of several things i've tried: app.directive('myresource', function() { return { restrict: 'e', scope: { resource: '=' }, baseurl: 'link/to/{{resource.id}}', template: '<a href="http://{{baseurl}}">{{baseurl}}</a>' }; }); which ends rendering: <a href="http://" class="ng-binding"></a> other things i've tried (like making baseurl function/sticking in scope ) have resulted in similar things/errors. is there way work? one way handle use directive's link function set variab...

using this guide i've implemented claims based auth on asp.net webforms successfully. problem while using claims based auth. cannot use forms based auth in same app pool: <authorization> <deny users="?" /> </authorization> <authentication mode="none" /> is there way use both?

i have flask-restful api configured cors options: api = api() api.decorators=[cors.crossdomain(origin='*', headers=['accept', 'content-type'])] ... api.init_app(app) my api accepts post requests may fail if data in request invalid: class myapi(resource): def post(self): args = request.get_json() if args.get('something'): return {'message': 'request worked, data received!', 'something': args['something']} else: abort(500, "error: data must contain 'something' field!") when make successful post request api can see cors options set: ... * upload sent off: 81 out of 81 bytes * http 1.0, assume close after body < http/1.0 200 ok < content-type: application/json < content-length: 205 < access-control-allow-origin: * < access-control-allow-methods: head, get, post, options < access-control-max-age: 21600 ...

i saw similar post dealing issue, problem wee bit different. in issue outlined here , concept outer div positioned relative, , inner div positioned absolute, , overflow:hidden preserved. my issue both divs, inner , outer positioned absolute. how can still preserve overflow: hidden on outer div? not sure of question, try achieve? see jsfiddle css: #outer { position: absolute; top: 10px; left: 10px; height: 80px; width: 50px; overflow: hidden; } #inner { position: absolute; top: 10px; left: 10px; height: 50px; width: 50px; } with html: <div id='outer'> <div id='inner'> // stuff here </div> </div>

i have x86_64 routine ends 0 in ymm register if successful, , i'd return non-zero if ymm register. i have way clearing ymm register, vptest'ing register against one, , conditionally incrementing resturn register (rax in case) if cf not set: " xor %%rax, %%rax \n" // clear rax " vxorpd %%ymm0, %%ymm0, %%ymm0 \n" // clear ymm0 " vptest %%ymm1, %%ymm0 \n" // compare ymm1 0 " jc endcheck \n" // branch on if no residue " inc %%rax \n" // inc rax otherwise "endcheck: \n" // result in rax this seems opaque way it. there better way, or more idiomatic or readable way? combining comments above, can done in 3 lines of assembly: "xor %%rax, %%rax \n" // clear rax "vptest %%ymm1, %%ymm1 \n" // if ymm1 zero, set zf "setnz %%al...

i trying write simple sql query in pgadmin loop through each table in database , change specified column name if exists. have never coded in sql after searching through many forums have managed come with: do begin in select table_name information_schema.tables loop if select column_name information_schema.columns table_name = 'i.table_name' alter table i.table_name rename column old_column_name new_column_name end if; end loop; any great. you can skip information_schema.tables entirely. just: do $$ declare rec record; begin rec in select table_schema, table_name, column_name information_schema.columns column_name = 'x' loop execute format('alter table %i.%i rename column %i newname;', rec.table_schema, rec.table_name, rec.column_name); end loop; end; $$ language plpgsql; with appropriate substitutions 'x' , newname . or make function takes them parameters, what...

from understand... if have form_for @model , params[:model] available when form submitted. furthermore, if form has 2 attributes attr1 , attr2 , params[:model][:attr1] , params[:model][:attr2] available when form submitted. in rails 4, you're supposed write method model_params says params.require(:model).permit(:attr1, :attr2) . you'd use model_params so: model.new(model_params) . however, do if need 1 of fields form? if needed params[:model][:attr1] ? example: def create @user = user.new(user_params) if @user.save # need access params[:user][:password] here redirect_to root_url, :notice => "signed up!" else render :new end end private def user_params params.require(:user).permit(:email, :password, :password_confirmation) end the gem responsible behaviour strong_parameters . permit() method decides pass on model based on attributes pass it. in case, passed :attr1 , :attr2 : params.require(:m...